2010 Range Rover Sport – Roadfly TV



740 Responses

  9. whatever0481 says:
    October 19, 2010 at 3:31 PM

    [..YouTube..] It is a beautiful SUV but has a bad reputation. Most owners are cocky wannabe men or celebrities and this is making it cheap. And because of its cheapness its not good enough for me…

  16. sunnycatch says:
    November 16, 2010 at 12:19 AM

    [..YouTube..] Jesse doesn’t look that comfortable in it. Front exterior looks okay but definitely not aerodynamic as Jesse says and the interior looks lame and plastic despite its overdone commercials. I’d question the most unreliable SUV on the planet. Plus the sticker price is enough said.

  29. Snowhite808 says:
    January 21, 2011 at 10:54 AM

    [..YouTube..] Persons more down to earth should look at the diesel version. Gets nice 28mpg on the road – has nice low end torque and the most important – you can get from A to B on the tank. The gasoline powered – they have a lot of useless power for towing something? Anything? + the diesel version is cheaper on all costs. Driving on bad roads people do have to remember the “sport” sign on it. It is by no means soft and comfy.

  34. Noobury says:
    February 13, 2011 at 6:31 PM

    [..YouTube..] although they call it a range rover, it isn’t really. it’s a beefed up sported down range rover look alike on discovery and jaguar foundations

  35. Kerickryantv says:
    February 17, 2011 at 10:29 AM

    [..YouTube..] my mom had a Range Rover Sport Supercharged And with in the first 5000 miles it had been in the shop no less then 5 times! so we so they gave us a new one a Range Rover same problem! i love Range Rover and have owned one and will own another one when they fix the electronic issue

  39. Kurohadol says:
    April 10, 2011 at 9:31 PM

    [..YouTube..] hell yea, i’ma buy me one of these! get a new nice black paintjob, have some 24s on that bitch, get low profile tires with big rims. fuck yea, this car can work baby! get some nitrous to get away from people, shit. def gonna buy this car someday.

  41. Default1235678 says:
    April 19, 2011 at 9:08 PM

    [..YouTube..] @Snowhite808 I agree, however here in America, Land Rover doesn’t offer a diesel version of any of their SUVs. Unfortunately, the smoke-belching tendency of diesels of old is still a stigma associated with the clean diesels of today for most Americans.

  45. missedagain says:
    May 20, 2011 at 12:16 AM

    [..YouTube..] @porsche558 haha buddy i’m not the one falling all over a women on the internet you creep. “Oh you’re so beautiful, so amazing, i think i’m in love!” Hahahahah

  46. scoza says:
    May 20, 2011 at 1:43 AM

    [..YouTube..] I still don’t understand the ra-ra about range rovers. everything looks cheap, and dated and cost around 85k to get a decent range rover.

  48. skbuoy says:
    May 31, 2011 at 8:42 PM

    [..YouTube..] @Default1235678 i disagree. most americans are educated or well aware diesels are fuel efficient. its the government and coorporate companies (ie petroleum co.) that dont want the us to be hoooked on diesel. u.s is the number one consumer of oil and oil companies want to keep it that way. I WANT DIESEL personally, but the only ones offered that are affordable is the jetta and large pick up trucks. not very appealing to the mass market

  49. Default1235678 says:
    May 31, 2011 at 9:23 PM

    [..YouTube..] @skbuoy I don’t think fuel efficiency is the issue. It’s the assumed lack of cleanliness from which, I think, most people shy away. Diesels have always been fuel efficient. I don’t want to drive a diesel car personally, but in my opinion, they exhibit a good technology, and the automakers ought to bring their diesel models to the US. As well, I don’t believe that the government is an inhibiting factor; their regulations no longer deem diesel cars as emissions unfriendly. I like the Jetta.

Leave a Reply

*


Follow

Get every new post on this blog delivered to your Inbox.

Join other followers: